Comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of pre-treatment technologies for desalination in South Africa

Authors

  • W Draper Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa
  • T Goga Sustainability, Economics and Waste Research Group, Smart Places Cluster, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Stellenbosch, South Africa
  • E Friedrich Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/wsa/2024.v50.i3.4051

Keywords:

life cycle assessment, pre-treatment, desalination, SWRO, South Africa

Abstract

In the context of South Africa’s water scarcity, desalination has emerged as a possible solution for coastal areas. However, the quality of the intake water for desalination is often problematic, prompting the need for pre-treatment. The aim of this study was to conduct a comparative environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) on 4 seawater filtration systems intended for the pre-treatment of a reverse osmosis desalination project. These systems were implemented in a pilot trial and are based on modern water treatment technologies, namely, granular filtration (pressure driven and gravity driven), dissolved air flotation (DAF), and ultrafiltration (UF). For all 4 systems, data were collected for both the construction and operation phases, and LCAs were performed, resulting in environmental scores that allow for comparison based on the pre-treatment of 1 kL of seawater of the same quality. The SimaPro LCA tool and the ReCiPe midpoint method were used and environmental scores were calculated for 18 impact categories, including climate change, acidification, toxicity, eutrophication, resource depletion, etc. This methodology also allowed the identification of the highest environmental burdens/scores within each system. The most significant finding is that local electricity consumption is responsible for the greatest proportion of environmental impacts. Thus, the systems consuming more energy for operating equipment such as blowers, pumps, and mixers were found to have the highest environmental burdens. Hence, the DAF system has the highest environmental scores for most impacts, followed by the single-phase gravity filtration system, then the two-phase partial pressure filtration system and finally the UF system. Therefore, focus should shift towards energy optimisation of process units, especially the rotary ones, as well as energy mitigation and recovery strategies. The use of renewable energy for pre-treatment should also be considered locally.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-31

Issue

Section

Research paper

How to Cite

W Draper, T Goga and E Friedrich (2024) “Comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of pre-treatment technologies for desalination in South Africa”, Water SA, 50(3 July). doi:10.17159/wsa/2024.v50.i3.4051.